Hi Ralph. I don't see this as a Scott versus Dave thing. I also think this thread has actually been pretty civil and free of bashing and name calling. I think it's more a discussion on right and wrong and the proper way to conduct business. I think there's a hidden instigator here that caused the whole issue, and that's the person who contacted Scott, knowing he already agreed to the deal, and offered him more money. I believe that to be the case since Scott never "counter offered" me, he just said deals off, done. Now he has a dilemna because he can't make it right with me without screwing the second buyer who agreed to pay more.

Scott brought this public, not me, so any negative press he's getting is the result of his own actions and his own post. Yes, as the seller he can choose to make any decisions he wants, which is what he did. From a business standpoint it was probably the worst decision he could make.

Dave.
SS - 1029