I think that is exactly what everyone is thinking about. It is why there is dissatisfaction in the ranks. It is not so much about who cannot play but who will now be able to play on behalf of someone else. At least in the first tournament each couple that played had a chance to get at least one of the winning strikes. Only one or two couples each one won and the distribution was fairly even, although a lot were won by one family, that included mother, and other relatives and friends. Ebay will tell the tale, but there is the legal issue of discrimination that has been brought into this that may cause the casino some problems, especially since they already set a precedent at the last tourneament. First come, first serve, husband or wife or both.