From previous posts here, it sounded like some of the casinos told IGT they didn't want the colorized $200s. It was reported that they were told to either take those colorized versions or not have any at all. So they took the lesser of two evils.
It doesn't seem then that expressing displeasure to the casinos will do much good in this particular case. I think there needs to be an open discussion with IGT in a friendly, controlled way that won't threaten the existence of $200s in the future. I'd be curious as to why they think it's a good way to go. Is it just cost savings? I'm hoping our Club management will take the lead if they agree, as opposed to lots of us "complaining" to IGT.
|