The Strike Point
Custom Search
   


The Strike Point Archive 01

Norm is amazed
In Response To: Re: non-answer - Kind of grin ()

First off, how the heck did fraud get sloted back into a discussion of chips and tokens. Remember the fork? We agree to disagree because you aren't listening.

Shill bidding is fraud, it doesn't need to be specificaly named.

Your case point was someone who pled guilty to a crime you contend doesn't exist. WHich is strange because then the police had to charge him with a crime that didn't exist. It seems you should be his defense attorney and give up on casino collectibles.

NOW grin back to the original topic.

A couple of people have posted a nice bunch of messages full of rumors and NOTHING from Gaming in the form of a regulation or memo or anything, but you want me to asnwer whether it's illegal for one of us to take a chip or token home based on a phone conversation with someone who will deny that conversation took place (if it indeed did?) and rumors upon rumors.

Is this called trolling or baiting?

I took the time to link to the current regulation 12. Did you read it?

Did you read my answer? The regulation controls Casinos not patrons.

The crux is the regulation comes from the fact that the US Government saw making casino tokens as minting money. After a negotiation, it was decided that if the tokens were only used for gaming and nothing else it wasn't minting coins.

Apply the same logic to chips which are actually checks, a promise for the casino to pay the holder the money. Valid only at the issuing casino, no other casino, nowhere else.

Now please Norm, go read Regulation 12, it's only five pages long. If you are still amazed, drop me a note, it's boring people here and taking up space to watch use having fun.

Note also that according to someone else who has contacted gaming, almost none of the rumors that have been posted on this BB and elsewhere are true. Strikes are not a thing of the past, all $200 tokens are not banned in the future, casinos can issue new rack chips if approved.

The decision by Four Queens was not as a result of the regulation, but an ownership decision.

Doesn't that start you wondering and being more amazed, that most of the rumors, gloom and doom, came from only two people?

Show me some evidence of the new regulation that was announced by Mark and David? Got a link to it, or a copy of it? Why would the people who work at other csinos still have no word on this.

Messages In This Thread

Extra! NOTES OF INTERVIEW WITH GAMING BOARD RE LE'S
Re: Extra! NOTES OF INTERVIEW WITH GAMING BOARD RE
Pete and Tom
Re: Pete and Tom
Re: Pete and Tom
Re: Pete and Tom - guilty
Re: Pete and Tom
Re: Pete and Tom
Re: Pete and Tom So no answer ?
Re: Pete and Tom So no answer ?
Re: Pete and Tom So no answer ?
non-answer - Kind of grin
Re: non-answer - Kind of grin
Norm is amazed
Re: Norm is amazed
My thoughts as well
READ #8 VERY CARFULLY
WHO ELSE DID YOU HEAR IT FROM?
Re: Extra! NOTES OF INTERVIEW WITH GAMING BOARD RE L
Strikes Not Effected
TRYING TO DELETE THIS POST WITHOUT SUCCESS
Re: Extra! NOTES OF INTERVIEW WITH GAMING BOARD RE L
Re: Extra! NOTES OF INTERVIEW WITH GAMING BOARD RE L
Re: Extra! NOTES OF INTERVIEW WITH GAMING BOARD RE L
Re: Extra! NOTES OF INTERVIEW WITH GAMING BOARD RE L
Re: Extra! NOTES OF INTERVIEW WITH GAMING BOARD RE L
Re: Extra! NOTES OF INTERVIEW WITH GAMING BOARD RE L
Re: Extra! WALT - hunts are Dead lol

Copyright 2022 David Spragg