I don't know too much about computers, since I am new to them, like I am to silver strike collecting. Here is what the message above should have said:

{ Alan, I think you are out of line attacking Archie. }

Jim, I think you are out of line for attacking me.

{ He's not into this for the profit. }

I am not in this for profit.

{ he was the founder of the "silly club" you refered to }

Based on the posts in this forum, it has apparently mutated into something evil, greedy and negative.

{ I happen to think that Archie is correct about his statement concerning John Sander's constant negative posts. }

I happen to think that Archie is incorrect about his statement concerning John Sander's [sic] constant negative posts.

{ He doesn't deserve the kind of reply you gave him. }

I don't deserve the kind of reply you gave me.

See how easy it is to just post nonsense and childish replies, likes yours have been, rather than face the actual issues? All you people do is attack others that you don't like. I have to assume that's because you can't attack what the person says, since it is the truth, so you try to use a smokescreen instead.

But, neither one of you has answered my questions about whether these Sanders posts are true. Why won't you answer this simple question? What are you afraid of? All you do is post "negative" messages saying how much you hate John Sanders, and how I am out of line for asking just one simple question that you all avoid. Neither one of you will admit whether what John says is true or not. Since I sent my earlier messages, I have read several posts over the past few days which have said the same things John has been saying, but neither you nor Archie have attacked these people, some of who used only their first names, like I do. You are all so childish and immature, not to mention "negative," that you are simply not worth any further attention.

End of discussion.