If we lose a few casinos who have had intercourse with us (a polite euphemism), that's no loss, is it? They have already seen our dollars, so if we withhold them, don't you think the message is clear? I'm not talking about active striking, like picketing, merely boycotting their over the top greed and exploitation of the collectors. IGT wil be the recipient of the message if all their work to get new strikes approved and minted result in shelf inventory instead of profit. I agree that calls to Gaming would be counterproductive, as would strident communication to the casino hierarchy. A civilized approazh is clearly in order. And since Jerry has dropped out of the VP race, all the officer candidates are very civilized people.